Brands

How not to be brand bland

In times of strong competition, brand matters more than ever. Mark Huxley offers his guidance in a feature article from LittleJohn's newsletter.

Click here to view the complete newsletter.

These uncertain financial times particularly resonate for the insurance industry, which apart from managing its own business, can have a significant influence on those of its clients. It is a time, therefore, that industry practitioners need to showcase their talents, attracting and keeping valuable clients. Simply put, it is a time for your brand to shine through and work positively for you.

So what is a brand?

Your brand is your business. It is the embodiment of who you are, what you do and what makes you the broker of choice. It must be clearly understood and recognised by your customers. After all, it is their opinion that governs your success.

Take coffee shops – Starbucks, Costa or Caffè Nero. Which do you and your colleagues frequent and why? Compare answers and I bet you’ll defend why yours is the right choice and not theirs. The coffee shops have created their identity and we are disciples of it. This example will equally apply to those that choose to work with you.

So what makes a brand good? There are four elements that must function in unison.

  • Authentic – is your brand fundamentally true to itself? It had a vision from the start, has it stayed true to it? It must never pretend to be something it is not.
  • Compelling – does it engage people emotionally, creating an immediate affinity? It’s this above all else that drives brand selection.
  • Distinctive – it’s innovators not imitators that really stand out from the rest. That point of difference makes you individual; convey it from the very core of your business.
  • Excellent – brand leaders truly deliver; they do what they say and do it well. Make false promises or fail to live up to expectations and you will quickly kill your reputation!

“Your brand is your business. It is the embodiment of who you are, what you do and what makes you the broker of choice”

As marketers, how do we understand and deliver strong brands?

Investigation, analysis & strategy

We ask the key stakeholders in the business to share their beliefs and ambitions. We learn their common values and, just as important, where they differ. This insight allows us to distil these values into words, adjectives and phrases that get to the very heart of the business.

Building the brand

With the words from stage one we have all the tools necessary to undertake any brand creation or re-engineering. We showcase the brand in action across the range of media; stationery, brochures, online, presentational, promotional, advertising, and so on.

Introduction & launch

The newly-created brand needs to be delivered internally before being used anywhere externally. It should be properly documented and presented to everybody. Fail to do this and all the hard work will be undone with a brand that is poorly understood, poorly executed, diluted and likely to fail. Not to mention losing all those potential Brand Champions you employ who can be your greatest sales force.

Implementation

Now is the time to identify the marketing disciplines that best promote your brand. Print, online, communications, PR, advertising and events are just some of the methods. Every execution needs to be carefully thought out, not just for its own merits but also as part of the wider campaign. A specific date or future event can help build momentum, as well as keeping focus on the whole campaign.

Insurance is an industry where adjectives like trust, reliability and professionalism ring through. With its complex distribution channels and networks, word-of-mouth is still fiercely active. Reputations can be made or broken quickly. In these challenging times, it is therefore vital to actively manage your brand in all its parts. Do it well and you will instinctively gain clients, make a powerful impression on them, and build loyalty, based upon your reputation to deliver.

Mark Huxley speaks to Post Magazine about Social Networking

As social media begins to shake off the stigma of being little more than a means to wile away time, Amy Ellis investigates whether, as some predict, 2010 will be the year this new medium becomes a quantifiable marketing tool. Referring to social networking and business in the same sentence can generate an air of distaste, with some seeing the former as merely a timewasting tool and many businesses blocking employee access to such sites during working hours.

Research into social media in financial services undertaken by Datamonitor in December 2009 revealed Facebook as the number one social networking site in 100 out of 127 countries. And figures from last July indicated that, while Facebook still dominates as a means of sharing content, Twitter is already about half as popular.

In the light of such numbers, it is not surprising that social networking is slowly losing its 'dirty word' status in the business arena. Companies are beginning to explore how social networking can strengthen their reputation, broaden their reach and, perhaps most importantly, grow their sales.

So, are UK brokers beginning to embrace sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Linked In on a commercial basis? Are they looking beyond a heightening of individuals' personal profiles and networking capabilities?

According to Bob Darling, franchise director at Coversure, you would have to be almost a Luddite to completely ignore social networking sites. "If insurance is meant to be a personality and relationship business, then the fact these sites are social means they are an important medium. In my opinion, they haven't really proved themselves as yet, but it doesn't mean they won't, of course," he suggests.

Mark Huxley, director of Lamb Creative Marketing & Consultancy, agrees — citing social networking as being about recognising the fact that insurance is still centred on the personal nature of the relationships you build and how brands have to generate trust, friendship and loyalty. "A broker dealing with an end customer in the very congested space of UK general insurance has got to have something out there to convince the customer why they should stay with them," he insists.

Future uncertainty

Being aware of new communication tools and exploring ways they can help in business should be the starting point for everyone, says Peter Elliot, head of marketing at Bluefin, which has reserved a number of sites in its corporate name but is not currently using them. "You can't ignore these major trends in communication, but at the same time no one can be sure of how they will develop. For instance, I ask myself: whatever happened to Friends Reunited? Like Rubik's Cubes and Sony Walkmans, once upon a time Friends Reunited was all the rage and it was almost impossible to imagine a world without it. That uncertainty surrounding the future of social media needs to be considered."

There may be something even more inherent that is holding brokers back from diving into social networking. As Paul Macbeth, managing director of Macbeth Chartered Insurance Brokers, points out, part of the problem in the insurance world is that it exists in a microcosm that is slow to adopt such developments until forced to.

This certainly seems to resonate with Kwik Fit Financial Services. Lisa McAndrew, e-commerce and marketing manager, says the company does not want to go in feet first and invest, preferring to monitor developments initially. Meanwhile, Matthew Clark, science and technology director at La Playa, points out that he is not aware of any brokers that have used social networks to produce tangible benefits. "They may be out there, but I would have thought it is not always easy to measure," he says.

This has not prevented La Playa from embracing social media and, despite some trepidation, Kwik Fit is also relatively advanced in this arena.

Katie Gouskos, marketing executive at La Playa, says: "Marketing generally is changing. The landscape is shifting and, as a small broker, we can't afford to spend millions on advertising; we are never going to compete in that arena. So social media is a brilliant opportunity for us to demonstrate our expertise, get among the bigger players and take it as a good opportunity, which I think it is."

La Playa is now planning to launch a blog, which it hopes will tie in with the Facebook and Twitter pages it already possesses. "We use Linked In to maintain relationships with other professionals, so hopefully once we have integrated all these forms of online marketing we will really begin to understand the power of social media," Ms Gouskos says.

Mr Clark adds: "We are not expecting social media, or our participation in it, to be some kind of magic bullet that will solve all sorts of problems and market us to our target audience almost cost-free. That would be quite naive.

"It will run alongside the other events we are doing, which include face-to-face networking, as well as the more traditional areas. We still do a bit of direct mailing but, for example, have moved away from mailing a hard-copy newsletter to contacts and instead send that electronically now.

"So, as things change, the traditional activities fragment and people move into more intelligent forms of communication, we will probably expect social media to gradually work more profitably for us, as opposed to the more traditional channels that increasingly won't work."

Finding time to tweet

Ms McAndrew explains that Kwik Fit has had a Twitter account set up for a year and has gained quite a large following considering its less-than-aggressive approach. One of the positives flowing from these sites, from a business perspective, is that they are free to use.

However she points to one cost Kwik Fit has predicted: "The big cost is from a resource perspective; it takes a lot of time setting these up and monitoring them. If you really want to do it properly, then you need to invest in resources and that's where we can see it becoming quite costly.

"So we need to weigh that up against the traditional media where we can see a return in our investment almost straight away. The question for us is whether we want to take resources away from the traditional; at the moment it is about trying to strike the right balance," she considers.

Julian Edwards, director at MCE Insurance, agrees that these sites require time and energy, as well as dedicated resources within existing operations that can manage and understand them. "The first route we have taken with Facebook is all about direct response marketing. Most companies that want to have a reach on Facebook will set themselves up as a fan page and this works incredibly well if you are a lifestyle brand.

"We use it because we are very niche and have a flag-bearer in the form of Big Ed - he has generated a following from the fan page we launched in the last quarter of 2009. But before we push on and try and get some serious numbers involved in terms of a fan base, we are taking time to learn about the medium, because you are trying to interact commercially with people's leisure time," he explains.

"Would we use Big Ed's fan base to pick up the phone and encourage people to take out their bike insurance with him? No. Fundamentally, this would be changing the relationship that you have with people in that media."

Mr Edwards considers that it is not about sales, but rather reaching your target audience in the right way. "When time is precious, you have got to give people something that they actually want to know about. It has got to be relevant; it has got to be two-way communication; and it has got to be frequent," he says.

As far as driving direct sales from socially interacting with people, Mr Edwards says only time will tell. "We haven't put that into our forecast, but it is new. Someone has got to master it somewhere down the line and, in five years' time, the model will have been well documented. That is the beauty of it.

"This is a subject I'm very interested in and do a lot of reading on. And I certainly haven't come across any case studies about how people have significantly increased their revenue from it directly. But I am not saying that is impossible. Unless companies that have invested heavily can see some results, however, they will lose interest and find other distributions," he insists.

Mr Huxley adds: "I don't actually think asking whether social networking is a fad or whether it is here to stay is the right question. These things are here; these are tools that can help businesses to communicate. So the question is: when are you going to embrace those tools to build your networks and communicate?

"If you had asked me a year ago whether people were engaging with this, I would have said absolutely not. Now Linked In is constantly being mentioned: everyone is getting onto it, some are realising what it can do for them as a business, but many others are not quite sure what they are on there for. People are engaging with it, at least in so far as realising there is a community sitting out there that they want to be in touch with.

"My entire career has been about the personal nature of networking, getting to know people and all the things that benefit my business life. That is what Linked In is for me at the moment," he says.

Ms McAndrew explains that most of the followers Kwik Fit currently has on Twitter are journalists, but following other competitors is where the broker is finding benefit. She has thought of a possible drawback with this use of social networking, however. "It will be interesting when we look at this from the customer perspective; that is where we have been holding back. Once we open this up to a lot of customers following us, we will undoubtedly get more people commenting. That could be from a good perspective, giving us positive feedback, but there is also the potential for negative responses if, for example, a customer has an outstanding complaint.

"Obviously, we could also view that as a good opportunity — as a company, we always want to show we are there to actively resolve complaints. But, again, this would require resources and could take up a lot of time because you simply can't predict how many responses you are going to receive."

Another potential downside — one identified by Mr Clark — is the risk of allowing staff to use these networking sites in a way that might be in contrast to the company's brand and image. "Some comments that are 'tweeted' can be unwittingly defamatory and that is a risk we have to acknowledge and blend into our existing electronic communications policies. We have considered this and I believe we are ahead of the game there; people are aware of what they ought to be doing and saying online."

A slow burner

Returning to the issue of generating sales from social networking, Mr Macbeth — whose firm is on Twitter and Linked In, but not Facebook — simply states: "You can't think that by sending out a few tweets, you will get a policy; it doesn't work like that. It is a slow-burning process that you have got to work at and stick with."

But it is not all doom and gloom. What social media can do is reach out to a huge audience, which the average broker would not be able to do otherwise, unless it is a huge firm or one prepared to spend a lot of money. According to Mr Macbeth: "That is where the potential lies — in the number of people you can connect with and the number of people you can start to build some form of relationship with online.

"We use social media to enhance our brand and raise our profile and reputation. In my view, the key to it lies in becoming a trusted source of information and advice. If you are just going to go on and try and sell things, it isn't going to work. Insurance isn't sexy enough to do that. It should be about building yourself up as a credible source of information.

"In the current climate, particularly, brokers should be doing everything they can to try and raise their profile," he adds.

Mr Edwards concludes that, in terms of target advertising, social networking has so far failed to prove itself. "So much hype has been spoken about it over the years; companies have invested time and resources in trying to understand it and the result has been minimal as commercial entities," he asserts. "But I really believe that 2010 will be the year that social media either makes it or breaks it in terms of media spend and marketing distribution."

First published in Post Magazine 06 Apr 2010

Lamb Cited by Design Week as an agency that really understands its clients' businesses

Creatives deserve a much bigger say in the boardroom, but David Bernstein thinks making them directors might debase their most useful quality - detachment

Creativity should have a bigger say in the boardroom, argues Guy Lane (DW 5 November), while advising creatives, ‘Relax, you won’t get on the board’. Alas, my experience endorses this view. Creative influence at the top requires a sympathetic advocate, preferably someone with a reputation within the company - not for creativity, but for business acumen.

But do companies really want creative input? Creativity is dangerous. It presages change. An idea is criticism. It questions the status quo, thedefence of which is the main preoccupation of those board members Lane describes as ‘providing stewardship rather than innovation’, like generals fighting battles from previous wars, to whom creative people are loose cannons.

Hence, most company directors are ambivalent, regarding creativity at best as a necessary evil. Creatives may be far-sighted and, by initiating change, able to give the company a role in the future, but, muses the corporate mind, how do we control this catalyst? How could the board accommodate such a renegade spirit, other than as a court jester, a licensed fool? Creatives today must be able to understand business and be adept in it. Their task is not to solve creative problems but to solve business problems creatively. It is precisely this skill that is missing from the average boardroom.

Never mind, says the corporation, we can always hire it in. And if the new business activity reported in these pages is any guide (DW 26 November), companies are not put out by the word ‘creative’. Four of the successful groups had something in common: The Market Creative, Origin Creative, Lamb Creative Marketing and Sperm Creative.

Board room illustrationThe real test of a company’s attitude to creativity is the way a consultancy is treated - as supplier or partner and, if the latter, as junior or equal. Some industry luminaries have broken the mould by becoming simultaneously non-executive directors of their clients, such as Richard Seymour of Seymour Powell and John McConnell when a partner at Pentagram. Alan Fletcher, of course, was almost always treated as an equal, but then he paid his clients the identical compliment.

Having someone of the calibre of a Fletcher on hand at key times in a company’s development can be truly beneficial. Lane bemoans the fact creative consultants are often ‘brought in after the fact to make sense of a merger.

Too bad that they’re not [there] when the deals are planned’. I was lucky enough to be part of a creative team called in at the planning stage of recent merger. We could act as independent catalysts, extracting by means of phrase-completion and picturecaptioning exercises what eachcomponent thought of the other and how the merged company might look in five years’ time. It goes without saying that we had to earn therespect and therefore the cooperation of the participants.

Our detachment from both parties gave credence to our actions and encouraged frankness. The value of the venture would have been less had we performed as board members of one of the partners. So I, too, am ambivalent regarding the interface of corporation and creativity, endorsing the company’s need to recognise creativity’s role within the organisation while denying it direct representation at the top table, but hoping that seated there is a sympathetic advocate.

Written by David Bernstein and first published in Design Week Magazine 28th January 2010